Tu Pum Pum – El General Produced by Michael Ellis 1989
Produced By Michael Ellis New Creation Enterprises/ MKE Entertainment Michael Ellis, pioneer of “Spanish Reggae”, founder of the “Reggaeton Movement”, creator/founder of New Creation Records – (47 Charles Street, New York, NY), where artists such as Edgardo Franco aka “El General”, Smooth the Hustler, Pesos, Tricky, El Profeta, Carlitio Soul, Owie Irie and Frank Bent aka “Killer Ranks” were born. New Creation was a grammy winning organization that changed the face of the music industry forever.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Lecture 1 of Leonard Susskind’s Modern Physics concentrating on General Relativity. Recorded September 22, 2008 at Stanford University. This Stanford Continuing Studies course is the fourth of a six-quarter sequence of classes exploring the essential theoretical foundations of modern physics. The topics covered in this course focus on classical mechanics. Leonard Susskind is the Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University. Stanford Continuing Studies: continuingstudies.stanford.edu About Leonard Susskind: www.stanford.edu Stanford University Channel on YouTube: www.youtube.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5
this is my cousin threw marrige in my family not lieing ask my father
mejor cancion tu pum pum pulgar arriba si lo escuxas en el 2012
Still better than 99% of all the music today
Wow I love this song
medios temas, saludos desde Chile !
Yes yes, ol skool reggae
A Este General deberían haberle echo el Homenaje….
Soy de Panamá, y esto yo no lo consideraría reggaetón, y dudo que la gente lo considere así, esto aquí se considera reggae de la vieja escuela.
el general 100%%%% kick all reguetonn ass !!!!!
yes my cubin people
Y o nadamas para los centroamericanos carnal,tambien los mexicanos sabemos reconocer lo bueno,y para el general mis respetos uno de mis cantantes favoritos
i todavia pegando en el 2012
this is the original reggae not like the imitation of regaeton
old school reagaeton
I never said Panama called his music Reagatton.
Good music here.
a este tiempor la palabra REGGAETON ni Existiaaa.. los Boricua le pusieron el TON al REGGAE..
Panama Never Called there music “reggaeton” so sorry for you not knowing
a este tiempo la palabra Reggaeton ni existiiaaa.. La palabra Reggaeton fue inventada por los Boricua para identificar el Reggae de Puerto Rico.. pue estoo nooo es Reggaeton
but that music is much better than today. because now they’re all talking pigs
There Ass! serious?
Escuchando al General en el 2012!!!!!!!! Tu Pum Pum mami mami
buena music
he´s a Jehovah´s Witness these days
Well i would not say he started it all because before reggaeton there was actual reggae groups in puerto rico. but yes the Panamanians have more connection to Jamaican reggae because of their West-Indian heritage.
Okay, in MY OPINION suskind is a shitty teacher.
He is a quality lecturer, and he explains everything about as simple as it can be explained. He’s not going to stand there dancing so I don’t know how exciting it could be made really The numbers and the evidence he explains should be exciting enough.
dude, relativity can be applied and measured. no one is being “duped” by Einstein. you just don’t understand enough of it.
my paper “How grandpa Einstein has duped everybody? “or General relativity in simple words
So guys its time to dump all this shiit in garbage. Have a look my funny paper
Okay Okay sorry for pissing you off, and dude I was kind of trolling you. Anyways, this course is kind of boring he doesnt get to the point fast.
Okay the first derivitive of a position function w/ respect to time is velocity. The second derivitive w/ respect to time is acceleration (the rate at which velocity is changing w/ respect to time.) I’m saying you don’t have to say “with respect to time” when you’re talking about acceleration. Its in the definition. “Time is just one kind of derivitive.” Sure but thats a bad way to think about it. Id wait til you’re in High school and take a Calc course that may give you a better understanding.
If you are doing partial derivitives, yes, but then that deals with three-dimensional things like in mapping. Saying the derivitive of velocity is acceleration is correct. velocity is the derivitive of a position function (the “with respect to time” is unneccessary, because of course it’s with respect to time, it’s velocity – it’s in the definition) Since your taking a second derivitive, which is acceleration (with respect to time, but again, that is essentially redundant.)
a position can have different derivatives, time is just one kind.
This is good.
Uggghhhh….Potatos are Obese Fries
The derivitive of velocity is acceleration. It is implied that it is with respect to time. You just take the second derivitive of a position function that describes the motion of an object. If velocity is the first derivitive (and it is) and it is with respect to time, then the second derivitive will bewith respect to time.
I do not care if you are impressed, I was explaining the ovious. Once again you said the derivative of velocity is acceleration, you are wrong it is that with respect to time, you also forgot that f=ma cannot be a law because mass is always constant (which not even my science teacher realized). BTW as a heads up, my english is in the level equivalent to a three year old so go ahead and state I am not inelligent.
Its not the science I dont understand, I understand it really well and know as much as the wave equation itself but I find his lecturing style boring, he does not jump to the point and takes an hour to explain what took feynman’s (harder) book ten minutes…
Acceleration is the derivative of velocity in respect to time, you cant just say that acceleration is the derivative of velocity cause jerks are also considered derivatives of velocity. F=ma is only right when you have constant mass, so it is not a law, however p/t is always right. I might be 13, but I am not stupid…
Just a heads up, momentum over time is equal to mass times acceleration. Acceleration is the derivative of velocity, which is change in speed over change in time, and momentum is the mass of an object changing speed over a period of time. Therefore, momentum over time is the same as mass times acceleration. According to Newton’s Second Law of Motion.
F=m*(dv/dt)=m*a.
You are NOT as brilliant as you think you are, clearly. Believe me, we are not impressed, and by the time you grow up and realize how unimpressive you are, perhaps you’ll see why and maybe gain a little humility, and then realize how little you really know. Humility is a good thing, it gives you the opportunity to actually listen for a change to the people who know more than you.
But, you being 13, I suppose we shouldn’t expect differently…
I suspect, given your age, that this is waaaay above your head, so you might as well be listening to someone just standing there, speaking a completely unknown language for two hours. Of course that gets boring. Don’t worry about it. By the time you graduate high school, you’ll understand the “language” used in the first college courses you’ll take. They’ll teach you what you need to know to understand the next courses, and so on.
this is the most boring fucking lecture ever, I will seriously not go to college if it is this shitty, reading the feynman lectures is better than watching this shit…. But I am only 13, maybe this is how this shit is…
So? Both are useless, chemistry is easily explained by physics and newtons second law of motion (the most important according to society) is heavily misinterpreted it is momentum over time not mass times acceleration.
Prof Susskind is a tremendous lecturer and provides insights that NYC public schools very seriously lack, thank you Prof. and Stanford
LoL yeah, the professor looked very annoyed.
Guys I’m eleven and I know the periodic table. And newtons laws.
I suppose I can’t translate subtitles into another language because of CC-BY-NC-ND. But I really think that translation of this perfect material could help people who didn’t know English or can’t understand fluent speech. So is it possible to get a permission for creating and translating the subtitles for this (and other) video? Does anybody know?
plate@akron.redirect” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ….
trichinella@misquoted.prospering” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ çà èíôó….
strove@hardships.believe” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ!…
temper@steel.lenins” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ çà èíôó!!…
urbanization@eluted.maxim” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…
resigning@parachutes.comrade” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ çà èíôó!!…
specters@irreproducibility.solitude” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thank you!!…
everett@flor.rampage” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx!…
adamantly@wild.paean” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thank you!!…
singers@halo.genres” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good….
fairchild@viscous.descendents” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ çà èíôó!…
bw@moscone.terramycin” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thank you….